This is the essence of our consumer economy. New and improved products are brought to market every day to replace old, inferior models. The bicycle industry is no different. And in the case of drivetrain components, repair or overhaul is usually superseded by replacement.
My "A" Bike Rear Derailleur |
My rear derailleur started its life as a part of the 2004 Campagnolo Centaur 9 speed gruppo. I had decided to make the change to Campagnolo at the end of the 2005 cyclocross season. At the time, all the wheels I owned were Shimano compatible. I couldn't afford to replace them, so to help reduce the financial cost of the switch, I opted to run a mixed drivetrain of 9 speed chains and cassettes from SRAM and Shimano with Campagnolo 9 speed shifters and derailleurs. A quick glance at Sheldon Brown's cassette spacing crib sheet reveals why this combination works.
The difference in center-to-center spacing between Shimano and Campy 9 speed cassette cogs is around 0.2 mm. If you adjust the rear derailleur so that it is optimally aligned with the center of the cassette, the maximum error when shifted to either end of the cassette is 0.8 mm. This is easily compensated for with the rear derailleur's limit screws and there is enough "slop" in a 9 speed system for acceptable shifting across the entire cassette.
Campy purists will cry blasphemy over this setup. But there are occasions where pragmatism must overrule passion, and my wallet ruled in favor of the former. However, I eventually built up a collection of Campy compatible wheels. And when the time came to move completely to 10 speed components, I felt my derailleur hadn't outlived its usefulness.
In 2001, a year after Campy introduced 10 speed to the world, they updated the design of their 9 speed system. They modified the indexing so that 9 speed used the same parallelogram geometry from their newer 10 speed rear derailleur. The only significant difference between the two derailleurs was the width of the pulleys. So after purchasing a set of 10 speed pulleys, my old derailleur was now updated to the newer 10 speed standard. Since then, I've only replaced the pulleys one additional time. The derailleur continues to serve reliably on my "A" cross bike.
Lately however, I have thought about replacing it. Campagnolo has a tradition of trickling the features of their flagship products down to the lower end components. The introduction of 11 speed shifting in 2009 introduced several enhancements to Campagnolo's long standing rear derailleur design. These enhancements have since been integrated into the 2011+ Centaur 10 speed gruppo.
2012 Centaur Rear Derailleur |
One of the most obvious design changes is the increased size of the outer plate and the parallelogram. The oversized features of the new derailleur are meant to increase rigidity and reduce stress on the joints of the assembly. This helps the derailleur battle the wear and tear that inevitably causes "play" in the parallelogram. Campagnolo has also updated their pulley design to the larger 11 tooth size also used by Shimano and SRAM. Manufactured from a rubber compound, they are designed to help reduce friction and excess vibration in the drivetrain. And in a move unlike Shimano and SRAM, the derailleur is rebuildable.
Excerpt from the 2011 Campagnolo Spare Parts Catalog |
There is a caveat if you upgrade to the new derailleur. Like the change a decade ago to their 9 speed system, the new 10 speed derailleur requires updated shifters to accommodate the geometry of the new parallelogram. If you're using the old Ergopower shifters, you're out of luck. There is no upgrade path. However, if you are like me and using the newer Ultra-shift levers, you can replace the right shift lever assembly separately, bringing your system up to par.
Campagnolo 2010-2012 Rear Derailleur Compatibility Chart |
These enhancements are compelling, particularly for the rough world of veldrijden, and some day I'll make the jump. I think the new design would out perform and last even longer than my old derailleur. But I'm hesitant to upgrade now. Maybe it's because I know my rear derailleur has a few more years left in it. Or maybe I'd rather spend the money on more tubulars. In any case, the thought of retiring a trusted component who has served me well for many years of racing is hard to swallow. Or maybe I'm just a little crazy.